Editorial Policy

What Gets Published Here

Screen Sight Care publishes reviews of eye supplements I have personally tested and tracked, and occasional posts on related habits or ingredient research that came up during that testing. Every product reviewed here was purchased at retail price on my own. The site does not cover supplements I have not used, and reviews are not based on manufacturer-supplied information or brand talking points. The information here comes from personal experience and research and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. For anything involving your actual eye health, an eye doctor is the appropriate resource.

Testing Structure

Each supplement gets a dedicated test period before a review is written. One product at a time, with at least three weeks off between products. That gap matters: some ingredient effects accumulate over weeks, and residual effects from one test should not distort the data from the next. During an active test period I log a weekly fatigue score on a scale kept consistent across all products tested, the monthly cost at the dose I was taking, and plain-language notes on anything I noticed changing.

Before writing, I look at the full log for the entire test period, not just the final week. Ingredient claims get cross-referenced against third-party transparency databases and, where I can find them, the underlying clinical research. If a product's label implies an ingredient is effective at a dose that differs meaningfully from what studies have actually examined, that discrepancy goes into the review.

Affiliate Links

Some links on this site are affiliate links. If you click through and buy, I earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Affiliate relationships have no influence over which products I choose to review or what I write about them. Products that showed no noticeable effect in my tracking are described that way. Products where I genuinely could not call it either way get that assessment. The commission does not enter into those judgments.

Corrections

If a fact I cited has changed, a dose I referenced turns out to be outdated, or something I wrote does not hold up against newer research, the contact page is the fastest way to flag it. Published content gets reviewed periodically and corrected when the underlying information has shifted rather than leaving outdated claims in place.